Search Documents

By Ian Thomson

OBJECTIVES OF EXPLORATION ? Prove/Disprove presence of potentially economic mineralization ? Keep on budget ? Minimize negative environmental impacts ? Gain a ?Social License to Operate? (SLO) WHAT IS A ?SLO? ? Granted by the local community ? Intangible, informal, non-permanent ? Has to be earned and then maintained ? Defined as ? Ongoing Approval (BSR and AccountAbility) ? Ongoing Approval, broad social Acceptance (Joyce and Thomson) ? Ongoing Acceptance (Nelson, and many others) ?Expression of the quality of a ?relationship?

May 1, 2010

Mining Subscribes to Murphy?s Law Personal observations on the past ?Perfect, benign deposit mines can be screwed up-spills and concentrate handling issues ?Long term contamination and water management assessments inadequate ?The ?permitting mentality? and its effects on the application of proponent and regulator resources ?Reliance on simple principles but nature and chemistry is more complex

May 1, 2010

Agenda 1.Energy consumption and energy costs ?focus and failings 2.Energy efficiency methodologies, people and supporting tools 3.Energy cost saving case studies from three minerals processing plants 4.The operations team and the supporting role of Operations IT 5.Conclusion: Reducing energy consumption and energy costs There are many good Energy Efficiency Methodologies ?Energy and GHG Emissions, Management Guidance Document, The Mining Association of Canada ?Energy Savings Toolbox ?An Energy Audit Manual and Tool, Canadian Industry Program for Energy Conservation (CIPEC) ?Lean and Energy Toolkit, Achieving Process Excellence Using Less Energy, www.epa.gov/lean ?Energy Efficiency Opportunities Assessment Handbook, www.energyefficiencyopportunities.gov.au

May 1, 2010

In most mines using presplitting the final excavated wall shows a zone of damage just below the crest and well defined presplit half barrels. The crest damage (surface dilation) zone varies and is added to by subsequent adjacent perimeter blasting operations. Keeping the preconditioning to a minimum is possible using the methods described in this paper, developed on several diverse and geographically distant mining operations to control crest dilation and preconditioning by presplitting in advance - not just laterally but vertically in advance. The first documented case (Delbridge, Marton and McSweeney, 2004) in the development of the concept was undertaken at AngloGold Australia Pty Ltd's Sunrise Dam Gold Mine (SDGM), located beside Lake Carey, some 730 km northeast of Perth, Western Australia. The mine had been developed in a series of cutbacks to a depth of over 300 m and began underground mining during the latter stages of open cut operations. This mine is fairly unique in that it utilised a single pass vertical presplit which initially extended over three bench heights and after the failure mechanisms were understood, over four benches. The presplit drilling for the three stacked benches started on the floor of the second bench so that any dilation was confined to the surface one bench above the crest and modified perimeter blasting was then developed to curtail damage from blasting adjacent to the new crest. The second case is based on a South African coal mine in the Witbank Coal Measures, 140 km northeast of Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa (RSA). It was important that blasting for optimal wall stability and minimal scaling was developed in advance. A dragline is scheduled to excavate the #2 seam midburden which is the lowest of the economically viable coal seams in the five seam Witbank Coal Measures. Mining of the overburden, coal and partings above the dragline midburden pass are by excavator and truck and each mining layer is individually blasted. The results of presplitting the midburden through the overlying coal seams and partings have provided a presplit with no surface dilation of the midburden crest and ensures any subsequent crest loss is solely due to blasting adjacent to the vertical presplit. Typical of all coal mines in South Africa only vertical presplits are used. Wall control is most commonly delivered by presplit blasting and one common sight after the dust clears is a ridge of broken blocks along the presplit row, usually with a main crack running between the presplit blastholes and often parallel cracks either side of the perimeter line. The surface rock strata or block structures have been dilated by the venting gases and shock waves. Decoupled, fully coupled, single or double deck charges are used depending on a variety of factors, anecdotal practices and perceived benefits. Preconditioning of the crest rock by blasting from above may not be visible to the naked eye (or non-existent in overburden in strip coal mines) but the high speed venting of explosives gases (and often the water in the presplits) preferentially follow existing cracks and structures because there is no developed presplit crack near the surface. This nearly always lifts, shifts and separates the surface structures and geological layers. Stopping the dilation by 'sacrificial' or 'in advance' presplitting has been shown to reduce the crest loss at both metal and coal mines. Drilling and presplit blasting through an upper level of bench or layer provides a degree of restraint to the target layer where the crest must be maintained and any damage caused by the venting gases will not cause concern as it is removed as planned, leaving a stable crest.

May 1, 2010

By Richard Morland

Some simple and fundamental objectives To challenge and inspire our people to embrace safety as a value ?A stand for safety as a value ?A stand for our people ?A stand by our people ?Prevent harm to our people ?Eliminate suffering for individuals, families, friends, colleagues

May 1, 2010

By Juliana Parreira

The past decade shows record increases in global demand for minerals and metals with an accompanying significant decline in skilled personnel. Mining companies today are examining new technologies to maximize production, reduce costs, and create safer work conditions to deal with this shortfall. Automation of an open-pit mine haulage system is receiving attention as a beneficial option since it provides more consistent and efficient operation of mining equipment, it removes workers from potential danger, it reduces fuel consumption significantly reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and it can help optimize vehicle repairs and equipment replacement because of more-predictable and better-controlled maintenance. This paper describes a simulation model under development using the EXTENDSIM software package to examine scale-up issues and constraints of autonomous vehicles in comparison to a manual system. The software can predict and manage Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), such as productivity, safety, cost, equipment failures, fuel consumption, and tire wear under different road and load conditions. By breaking-down the various systems of an autonomous haulage truck and simulating the overall haulage system using a Monte Carlo approach, the model becomes a flexible and powerful tool to use within a mining organization. Direct comparison to a manuallyrun system can be done to show the cost and operational benefits of automation. Project managers can use this tool to guide decision-making about possible application of autonomous haulage trucks at a specific mine site.

May 1, 2010

By A. Pratt

Portland cement is primarily used to solidify backfill in underground mine workings and it represents a major cost in mining operations. CANMET-MMSL has invented an alternative binder technology that does not contain any amount of Portland cement and is made using waste materials, such as development rock and smelter slag. The technology has been successfully tested with many types of base metal and ferrous slag. Research conducted in collaboration with several mining operations in Canada has shown that the CANMET-MMSL binder has considerable potential as a replacement for Portland cement in mine backfill. An integral part of the overall mining operation, backfill is used for two main purposes: safety and environmental remediation. Depending on the mining method used, backfill provides a working surface, stabilizes stope and pillar walls, as well as the surrounding rock mass, and controls caving of stope backs. There are several benefits associated with the replacement of Portland cement in backfill, including reductions in (i) the footprint by placement of slag waste underground, (ii) the environmental effects and long term liability resulting from disposal and containment of slag waste on surface such as acid rock drainage, (iii) GHG as a result of reduced Portland cement usage (the production of 1 ton of Portland cement produces 1 ton of GHG), and (iv) the significant costs associated with reduced Portland cement usage.

May 1, 2010

The Telfer main dome open pit is operated by Newcrest Mining Limited at a current production rate of 50 Mt/a from a pit dimension compromising 2 km strike length, 1 km width and 250 m depth. As part of the refeasibility of the Telfer operation undertaken early this decade, Newcrest identified that an underground sublevel cave (SLC) operation along with an increased scale of open pit would support a new plant targeting the processing of gold and copper ore at 17 Mt/a rates. The SLC was initiated in late 2006 and broke into the open pit in late 2009. This situation is unique across the mining industry where a cave breakthrough was planned and occurred within an active large open pit operation. The SLC broke though into the west side of the Main Dome open pit into a specially prepared bench that was left at the 5384 RL of cut-back stage 3. A main haulage ramp is within 100 m from the edge of the cave breakthrough zone and this ramp passes down to the active levels which are progressing toward the 5200 RL. This paper presents insight into the mine planning and risk management associated with continued operation of the open pit operation while an active SLC breaks through. The cave breakthrough presents unique areas for risk management as there is potential for rapid propagation and subsidence. To support the undertaking, mine design and major hazard management planning has been carried out. Focus areas include; dual ramp system design, preloading the breakthrough area, monitoring of cave propagation and air gap using a seismic system and deep hole extensometers, wall stability and subsidence monitoring using radar and prism systems, and key trigger and response planning.

May 1, 2010

By Richard Morland

The Ekati Safety Guarantee is a conversation that has been taking place at Ekati for the last two years. It is a challenging, confronting, inspiring conversation which encourages people to see and pursue the possibility of guaranteeing that nobody who works at Ekati will be seriously injured or killed at work. The conversation takes us out of the normal, incremental approach to safety improvement; it takes us out of the world of striving, of seeking, of trying, and allows us to stand in, and be a stand for the future possibility of Zero Harm. It requires an unreasonable stand for, and commitment to, our own safety and the safety of our colleagues. A Powerful Conversation The safety guarantee began with conversations between executive team members and has been propagated regularly through the line through management meetings, pre-shift meetings, during workplace inspections, job safety observations, job and project planning, orientation and induction sessions, and when opportunities present themselves. This is a conversation that continues outside of Ekati with family, with government, with community members. It is a stand for safety as a value. The conversation about the safety guarantee is now pervasive at Ekati and forms part of a framework of initiatives that have led to sustained improvement in safety performance. During the last two years, the recordable injury frequency at Ekati has dropped to its lowest level in Ekati?s history. At the same time, job safety observations have increased from 500 per month to 4000 per month, whilst the overall number of people at Ekati has reduced by 30%. It has led to new ways of thinking about the conduct of operations. It influenced the 2008 upgrade of the Ekati process plant, resulting in the development and implementation of a crane lift protocol that eliminated injuries during over 100 lifts in two weeks, in an area of difficult geometry and with multiple entrances. It created space to successfully conduct a challenging commissioning period for the process plant crusher, during which time the machine was disassembled and reassembled several times, without incident or injury. No production pressure was permitted to interfere with this work, in line with our stated aim that we wanted everyone involved to guarantee that they would not be seriously injured or killed?our people had the space to do the work at a pace, and in a way, that guaranteed this outcome.

May 1, 2010

By David Davidson

Overview- Points To Be Addressed ? Review the building blocks of a successful and vibrant industrial economy ? China?s current position in the global economy ? China?s voracious appetite for raw materials ? Distortion in import/export trends ? Areas of strategic importance for China - Steel and its components - Agriculture self sufficiency - Energy now and for the future ? Do current valuation techniques fairly value ?strategic? assets? China ? The Economical Miracle - Massive shift in population from rural to urban - ?Middle class? growing rapidly, hence strong consumer growth - China is the manufacturing center for the world ? cheap labour and - modern facilities - Infrastructure build out ?US$585b stimulus package and 5 year plan - Rail ? 30,000 kms of new track planned by 2020 - Power ? 50% capacity increase, including 35 nuclear reactors - 100 major new airports - State of the art process and manufacturing facilities - Port capacity ? 100m TEU capacity increase by 2020 Class 1 national highway ? 35,000 km?s by 2020

May 1, 2010

By Michael Davies

Mined Material Management Meeting or Missing the Mark? o you agree that we have the technology to consistently design robust M3 facilities? ?YES your experience do these M3 facilities perform as expected during operations? ?USUALLY hat can be done to improve performance, e.g. better communications between project and operating teams, discontinuity between design and operational input by designers, others? ?UNDERSTANDINGWHY THINGS GO WRONG an we identify the key characteristics of ?good M3 facilities?, i.e. ones that are performing well? Can we identify ?good M3 facilities?, i.e. ones that perform well and can be held up as examples? ?WITHOUT QUESTION?? your opinion, for what reason do they not perform as expected? ?NO SINGLE REASON??..

May 1, 2010

By Don Welch

Pressures for change ?Land use constraints ?Project financing ?Local communities ?Environmental issues ?Sustainability requirements ?Stricter regulatory procedures ?Technical excellence ?Reduce risk ?Impacts of failure & non-compliance

May 1, 2010

By Kernaghan Webb

Organization of Presentation ?Genesis, Premise, Hypothesis ?Background ?Methodology ?Key research questions ?Research Team to Study Kinross Maricunga ?Research Milestones ?Chilean context ?Chilean Legal Framework ?Kinross Gold the basics, CR approach, Maricunga ?Issues, Perspectives ?Concluding remarks

May 1, 2010

This paper examines the latest advances in mine hoist motor and drives systems. The technology employed for large hoists has migrated from the traditional DC technology to AC motors with cyclo convertor drives, and more recently, advances in pulse width modulation (PWM) drives have resulted in these being applied to large hoist drives. When combined with PWM drive technology, the induction motor presents the ideal solution for hoist applications This paper examines the factors in choosing a suitable PWM drive and motor for a hoist installation. Factors under consideration include: ? hoist duty cycle, ? drive rating restrictions, ? choice of power semiconductor device,, ? low speed operation, ? maintenance ? reliability The cage induction motor and synchronous motor are compared and it is shown that the induction motor is the motor of choice for large hoists.

May 1, 2010

By Stephen Hardcastle

Personnel Heat Exposure Issues In Canada?s Deep Mechanized Mines ?Project developed in 2004 ?Base/precious metal industry identified heat stress/management as a major challenge affecting productivity and operating costs ?Project started in 2005 ?Current research nearing completion ?Guidelines, further data analysis and ?Communicating the Science? will continue into 2011 Managing Heat Exposure Control?. The cost implications ?Controlling the environment ?Ventilation already a major expenses/energy user ?Large Canadian mines are currently delivering massive volumes of air 15-20 tons of air/ton ore ?Large investments in ventilation upgrades, mechanical cooling

May 1, 2010

Westwood Quebec Long Life, Low Cost CONSTRUCTION UPDATE ? Shaft advanced to 840m (after 1 year), 3 km of down ramp and 2 km of exploration drift ? Head frame and hoist room structure completed ? 2009, 84,700m drilling program completed (increase 9%) 2010 OUTLOOK ? $102 million expenditures planned ? Shaft to advance to 1,300m and the first loading excavate 71,500m drilling program planned

May 1, 2010

As Pliny commented two millennia ago, The only certainty is that nothing is certain. Despite the many breakthroughs, advances and promises, the way we each live and work remains awash with technological, economic and political uncertainty. The resources sector is no exception in this regard. Mining itself is much more than a complicated process or recipe; it is a complex adaptive system. The way we adopt and adapt new technologies, the way we evolve data into corporate wisdom, the way we make decisions and even the way we view our concept of rationality should each be the subject of intense review. Translating these sentiments into sustainable company growth is indeed the challenge. This is unlikely to be achieved within convention, but through innovation. The game is changing!

May 1, 2010

Background Chronology 2008 Positions May 8, 2010 Summit Going Forward Say one thing and do another ??Genuine passion to see our customers succeed?, ?A passion for exceeding our customer?s expectations? Self serving actions to gain competitive advantage at the expense of the customer No single supplier or technology can manage the overall mine and its integrated operation - April 2005: Informal meeting at Toronto CIM 2004 -Unanimous interest - July 2005: Formal Calgary Meeting, developed: - Scope and vision statement , - OEM/OTM communication plan, - industry communication plan - Aug?Nov 2005: Aligned with SMART - Nov 2005?May 2006: Direct OEM, OTM communication - May ?Sept 2006: Developed baseline standards - Sept -April 2007: Developed SMART document - Sept 2007: Document distribution and request OEM OTM response - Jan ?May 2008: Acquired OEM OTM feedback and positions May 2008: Results presented to SMART and discussions on next steps

May 1, 2010

By Greg Barnes

Agenda ? The Mining Stock Life Cycle ? Current Environment ? Valuation ? Golds ? Valuation ? Base Metals ? Case Study ? Quebrada Blanca Hypogene Commodity Investment Cycle ? Macro-Economic Indicators ? LME Inventories ? watch the trend; rising inventories ? bad for prices, declining inventories good for prices ? OECD Leading Indicators ? PMIs ? Purchasing Manager Indices ? Industrial Production ? more important for metals consumption than GDP ? Housing Starts ? US, Europe ? Auto Sales ? All things China ? metal imports/exports; SHFE inventories; SRB stockpiling ? Seasonality ? it does play a role ? What is Chris Dutton (TDSI Quantitative Analyst) saying?

May 1, 2010

By Harvey McLeod

M3 -Technology HOWEVER:In practice we have limitations ?Clients: aggressive or cost based; inexperienced ?Consultants: ?expanding market w/training limitations ?Prescriptive designs ?Lack of senior oversight ?Regulators: difficult to retain technical capacity ?Stakeholders: perceptions and expectations ?Physical settings: challenging terrain, climate, soils/rock Do M3?s Perform? YES?Generally M3?s since mid-1960 do perform ?BC Closed Mines: Afton, Highmont, Trojan, Bethlehem, Cheni, SNIP, NO?ARD/ML issues?e.g. Equity Silver, Samatosum; selenium, cadmium, sulphate

May 1, 2010