Search Documents

By Gordon R. Luster

Mineral-processing plants commonly rely on homogenization and proportioning facilities to reduce the variability of incoming raw materials and to blend different materials together to satisfy quality specifications. To determine appropriate designs for these facilities, plant designers need information about the variability of the mined materials, measured as the materials enter the plant. But if the materials to be mined in the future differ greatly from those used in the past, only information extracted from exploratory drilling of the materials in the around may be available. Fortunately, useful information for plant design may still be obtained by combining simulated mineral deposits with simulations of likely mining procedures. The output of a mining simulation is a time series of simulated raw-material characteristics that should mimic the behavior of the real materials to be delivered to the plant in the future. This paper shows how conditional simulations of coregionalized ore grades can furnish information useful in the design of homogenization and proportioning systems.

Jan 1, 1986

By P. Massacci

This study deals with the development and utilization of computer models for evaluating the extent to which variability of raw material grades can be reduced from the deposit to the processing plant. The specific case of a cement works is examined. The deposit and the elementary quarring operations were modeled for the medium and long-term planning of production with the objective of predicting grade variability of the flow stream in time. The feeds inferred from previous modellings were used for simulating storage operations. In particular, the storage process (linear stockpile, as an alternative, blending from various heaps) was modelled in order to select the main parameters of the process to minimize grade variations of the feed to mill. The ways followed for modelling the prehomogenization process are described. The homogenization performance and efficiency in the silo stage has also been studied and an estimate made of the distribution of residence time on the basis of input and output sampling.

Jan 1, 1986

By Colin P. Skidmore

Long touted as Australia?s fourth uranium mine the sediment-hosted Honeymoon Uranium Project is close to commercial production using insitu-leach mining methods. Uranium mineralisation occurs as pitchblende coatings on unconsolidated quartz sand and gravels within a stacked aquifer system in a buried palaeochannel located in the Curnamona Region of South Australia. A final NI43-101 Feasibility Study is close to completion which has included extensive delineation drilling using PFN technology to accurately measure uranium grade and distribution. This data integrated with a detailed 3D sedimentalogical model is being used to optimise wellfield and plant design.

May 1, 2006

By M. R. Dion, K. Frenette, R. K. Jonas, S. Simard, F. Robichaud

"In 2011, a site study indicated that the application of Honeywell’s Multivariable Predictive Control Technology (MPC) to the Goldex processing facility would provide significant opportunities for improvement. Grinding MPC was implemented in the SAG Mill in June 2015. This pilot application, called Phase 1, featured one of the first Multivariable Predictive Controllers to be installed in a Canadian mineral processing plant. Since the implementation of MPC, gold recovery from the gravity circuit has increased. MPC contributed to a decrease in flotation feed particle size (120 to 112 µm) and an increase in the SAG feed tonnage (8.5% increase). MPC also increased and stabilized the % solids of the SAG feed, which can have an impact on cost reduction (mechanical maintenance). Additionally, MPC increased productivity, providing grinding operators with more time to perform other tasks. Further anticipated benefits include the standardization of the grinding circuit operation from one team to the next, thereby minimizing circuit disturbances resulting from different operating philosophies. This paper will discuss the advanced control project development and justification, the technology and rapid implementation process, the performance results and the benefits obtained.IntroductionGoldex is an underground mine located near Val-d’Or that is owned and operated by Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). Between 2008 and 2011, mining focused on the Goldex Extension Zone (GEZ). In 2011, the project was halted due to geotechnical problems; operations ceased until late 2013. Goldex operations resumed in September 2013 with the M and E zones, for which there were 0.7M gold ounces of proven and probable reserves, 2.1M ounces of measured and indicated resources and 1.2M ounces of inferred resources, totalizing 4M ounces. Life expectancy was extended until 2024."

Jan 1, 2017

By Massimo Concilia, Remo Grandori, Paolo Nardone

Paul Y. – SELI Joint Venture had been contracted to build the longest section of the Strategic Sewage Disposal Scheme (SSDS) – Stage I. This involved two tunnels under urban and marine areas excavated by high performance hard rock open type TBMs operated from deep shafts. A specific ground treatment program was developed using advance probing and grouting to control water inflow into the excavations. The article describes: the technologies adopted, the experienced problems, the encountered productions and their interrelation with the water inflow amounts, the possible improvement in the technologies for the excavation of the future stages of the same project as well of any other project under similar conditions.

Jan 1, 2001

By Will Foreman, Douglas D. McLearie, Edwin K. H. Tong, William H. Hansmire

Hong Kong’s Strategic Sewage Disposal Scheme (SSDS) Stage I involves the provision of a system of deep tunnels for transporting to a central treatment works wastewater collected from a number of catchments around Victoria Harbour. For the SSDS Stage I works, about 24 km of tunnels have been excavated in hard rock at depths ranging from about 80 to 150 m below Victoria Harbour and the surrounding heavily developed areas of Kowloon and Hong Kong. Five tunnel boring machines(TBMs) with diameters ranging from 3.2 m to 4.3 m were used to excavate the tunnels. Tunnel excavation has been completed and tunnel linings are in progress. Major tunnelling issues such as ground stabilisation and water control encountered in the project are summarised. An overview of one of the possible future tunnel systems that might be adopted in subsequent stages of SSDS is also presented.

Jan 1, 2001

By John Armstrong, Michael Savill, David Powell

Hong Kong is an intensively developed region and has the highest vehicle densities in the world. In 2000 there were 6.6 million people and 580,000 vehicles using 1,890 km of road covering the 1084 km 2 territory. The high vehicle and population densities together with the difficult terrain have seen road tunnels emerge as key components both in the current and future road transportation network. Currently there are eleven operating highway tunnels in Hong Kong, seven government owned and the remaining four “build, operate and transfer” franchises, see Figure 1. The very first tunnel was the dual two Lions Rock Tunnel completed in 1967and the latest the dual 3 lane Tai Lam Tunnel opened in mid 1998. Figure 2 shows the alignment and statistics for all 11 Hong Kong tunnels. Looking ahead, Hong Kong has embarked on the study and design of the next generation of major highways and as many as a further seven tunnels are currently under feasibility study or detailed design. This seems an opportune year to produce a broad appreciation of the fire strategy, life safety and ventilation practices in Hong Kong not only for the existing tunnels but the new standards and requirements for the next generation of Hong Kong tunnels. This paper provides an overview of the fire strategy, life safety and ventilation of Hong Kong’s existing and planned tunnels. The paper pays particular attention to the areas where the unique conditions and requirements in Hong Kong impacts on tunnel and systems design and the solutions adopted to overcome these challenges.

Jan 1, 2001

The Honor Roll includes the names of all members of the Institute whom we know to be on active military duty at the date of its compilation, February 7, 1918. We are aware that there are many others of whose activities we have not been informed, and we shall be grateful for information as to any such omissions from the Roll. 1. MEMBERS ON ACTIVE MILITARY SERVICE Mail addressed to members on the first division of the Roll and sent to the office of the Institute Will be forwarded according to the best of our knowledge at the time. AARONS, J. BOYD, Capt., 4th Reinforcements, 11th Infantry, Australian Imperial Force. '05 ADAMS, HENRY, Capt Asst. to Dept. Engr., Northeastern Department. '02 AGNEW, FRANK VANS '04 ARBE, FREDERICK R., Capt 33d Engineers. '97 ALDER, ALFRED Engineers' Reserve Corps. '17 ALFORD, NEWELL G., Sgt., Bureau of War Risk Insurance, Headquarters 84th Division. '14 ALLEN, HEMAN H., Private Co. D., 8th Reserve Engineers. '17 AMBLER, HARRY A., Lieut 30th Infantry. '16 ANDERSON, ALEXANDER, Lieut Royal Garrison Artillery. '07 ANDERSON, GEORGE K., JR., See. C, 1st Co., 3d Officers' Training Camp. '17 ANDREWS, CLARENCE W., 1st Infantry Co., Officers' Training Camp, 83d Division. '13

Jan 1, 1923

The Honor Roll includes the names of all members of the Institute Whom we know to have been on active military duty it the date of compilation, Mar. 5, 1919. Despite our efforts to have this list accurate and complete, some of our members who have been rendering military service are probably left off because of the fact that we have not been informed of their military connection. The list of men in military service has been compiled with great difficulty owing to the modesty of the members, who in their patriotism began their service but neglected to send us notice. In 1918, We published a separate Honor Roll of the Institute in which we included a list entitled "On active duty in other departments of the service" which contained the names of members who were rendering important emergency service to the Government other than in the Army. This list is entirely omitted this year because any list We might compile for this purpose would be entirely inadequate and must inevitably do injustice to a large number of our members who have been devoting great time and making many sacrifices for the benefit of the government along lines not within our ken. It is not too much to say that almost all our membership in this country has been, more or less directly, doing its uttermost for the successful prosecu¬tion of the war. The active work of many of these members we are Well aware of, as is also the rest of the civilized world. Faithful and wholehearted efforts on the part of many other members we have not been informed of, so that any list would be both incomplete and unsatisfactory.

Jan 1, 1923

Jan 1, 1924

Jan 1, 1923

Jan 1, 1923

Jan 1, 1908

T. H Aldrich '96 Walter H. Aldridge '89 R M. Atrater, Jr '97 James B Bailey '00 Samuel Barker, Jr. '00 John F Berry '93 Charles A Bohn '93 H. A Brassert '99 Victor B. Buck '98 Frederick Burbidge '87 Frederick P Burrall '97 John Cabot, Jr '99 William McC. Cameron '97 W Gaston Caperton '94 Norman Carmichael '99 Alvin B. Carpenter '97 Charles A Chase '00

Jan 1, 1952

Jan 1, 1925

[Year of Election 1944. WALTER HULL ALDRIDGE New York, N. Y. 1946. PETER M. ANDERSON Johannesburg, South Africa 1946. CHARLES CAMSELL Ottawa, Ont., Canada 1946. CHARLES AUGUSTUS CARLOW Fife, Scotland 1946. CECIL DESCH London, England 1946. WILLIAM FRASER London, England 1922. FEDERICO GIOLITTI Torino, Italy]

Jan 1, 1946

[Year of Election to Honorary Membership 1876. PROF. RICHARD AKERMAN Stockholm, Sweden. 1913. DR. FRANK DAWSON ADAMS Montreal, Canada. 1920. HENRY STURGIS DRINKER Bethlehem, Pa. 1888. PROF. HATON DE LA GOUPILLIERE Paris, France. 1906. SIR ROBERT A. HADFIELD London, England. 1917. HERBERT HOOVER Stanford University, Cal. 1919. ROBERT W. HUNT Chicago, 111. 1915. JAMES FURMAN KEMP New York, N. Y. 1905. PROF. HENRI Louis LE CHATELIER Paris, France. 1913. EZEQUIEL ORDOENEZ Mexico City, Mexico. 1909. ALEXANDRE POURCEL Paris, France. 1911. ROBERT H. RICHARDS Boston, Mass. 1906. JOHN E. STEAD Middlesbrough, England. 1902. PROF. DIMITRY CONSTANTIN TSCHERNOFF Petrograd, Russia. 1907. CHARLES D. WALCOTT Washington, D. C.] [ ]

Jan 1, 1925

Year of Election 1959 Andrew Fletcher, New York, N Y "For his outstanding leadership in the lead and zinc mining industries, and for his able and devoted services to the Institute as its Treasurer and President, and as a Director for many years " 1917 Herbert Hoover, New York, N Y 1955 George M Humphrey, Cleveland, Ohio 1950 Zay Jeffries, Ptttsfield, Mass 1942 Essington Lewis, Melbourne, Vic, Australia 1959 John M Lovejoy, New York, N Y "For his distinguished service to the Institute, for his outstanding contributions in furthering the professional status of petroleum engineers, for his pioneering in application of engineering to petroleum production, and for his outstanding record of public service on behalf of the petroleum industry " 1957 Donald H McLaughlin, San Francisco, California 1957 C H Mathewson, New Haven, Connecticut 1938 Albert M Portevin, Parts, France 1957 Fred Searls, Jr, New York, N Y

Jan 1, 1960

Jan 1, 1912

Jan 1, 1914