Search Documents

THE Woman's Auxiliary now has its own publica-tion, a monthly news letter that is mailed direct to all its members. It is a lively and readable sheet. Any member of the Auxiliary failing to receive it should communicate with Mrs. J. E. Johnson, Jr., 49 Church Lane, Scarsdale, N. Y., and get on the mailing list. The detailed reports of the meetings will hereafter ap-pear in the News Letter rather than in MINING AND METALLURGY. The regular Board meeting held on March 3, with Mrs. Barron presiding, was well attended and the re-ports of the committees, and from local sections, showed a keen interest in the work. of the organization. Steps are being taken to endow a "Mary Young Westervelt Scholarship," libraries are being built up in mining towns, and interesting reunions .are being held by the members in the various local sections. The Auxiliary is filling an important place and doing it well. Women of the families of Institute members not already affili-ated with it would find it pleasant to get in touch.

Jan 4, 1927

By R. W. Raymond

Franklin Guiterman was born March 7, 1856, in Cincinnati, Ohio, where his father, William Guiterman, was at that time engagcd in the wholesale dry-goods business. Both of his parents were natives of Bavaria, but the inspiration of America was upon them, as they gave to their son a peculiarly American name, symbolizing thrift, individualism and scientific knowledge. Franklin Guiterman received his general education in the grammar schools and the Hughes High School of Cincinnati. He finished the latter course in the early 70's of the last century, when the great demand for mining and metallurgical experts in this country naturally led his parents to direct his further studies in that direction. Accordingly, he went to Europe, and studied at the Royal Saxon Mining Academy of Freiberg, where he completed the course in 1877, at the age of 21, and returned to the United States to engage in mining and metallurgical practice. Going to Colorado, he became assayer for the Terrible mine, at Georgetown, and in 1878, for the Little Chief mine at Leadville. The position of assayer, particularly at that period and in that region, was the door to much valuable knowledge of mines and ores. Besides learning the nature and value of the different classes of ore from the mines of his own company (if he was employed by a company) the assayer, had the first chance, through his outside customers, of seeing and testing the specimens brought by prospectors, and thus learning of important new discoveries. Moreover, if he possessed metallurgical knowledge, he might advance to the position of a metallurgical manager. Guiterman stayed in Leadville four years, and during that period was assayer or chemist for several different companies. Then for about a year he superintended copper-mining operations at Hartville, Wyo. In 1884, he had charge of sampling works at Silverton, colo.—an admirable opportunity for gaining wide knowledge of the varied ores of the San Juan country. In 1885, he was Superintendent of the Mingo plant of the Pennsylvania Lead Co., at Sandy, near Salt Lake City, Utah. The foregoing list of employments, each occupying not more than a year, certainly looks like the history of a rolling stone, gathering no moss. But the cause of these frequent changes was not inefficiency in each new position. In that time and period, a man who lost his place for such a reason was not likely to get another in the same neighborhood might away. And as for gathering "moss," the kind of "moss" that

Jan 1, 1918

By Raymond Mancha

The purpose of an accurate underground pressure survey is to obtain a pressure gradient along the circuit or circuits under investigation. The pressure gradient shows the rate of pressure drop between various observation points along a circuit. This determines excessive resistance regions and the economic feasibility of correcting such conditions by cleaning airways, driving additional airways, or modifying existing airways. A pressure gradient is useful for predicting the effect on other parts of the circuit when adjusting the air regulation on any one split or when planning a field airshaft or slope or a new drift to the outcrop. A single-compartment airshaft often produces disappointing results because it relievcs only a part of the circuit instead of the over-all mine pressure. It is valuable to know how the circuit pressure drop is distributed. The underground pressure survey is used also to determine the friction coefficient for various types of airway. High precision work is required to establish these vital data for predicting the characteristics of mine pressure volume when projecting new mine developments. Methods Regardless of the type of instrument used to conduct a circuit pressure survey, the work should preferably be performed at a time when the mine is idle, in order to avoid air-flow disturbances from moving trips and cages or from the opening or closing of trap doors. Preferably the survey should be made when the barometer is comparatively steady, to restrict variation in the air specific weight at observation stations while the circuit is traversed. The two most commonly used instruments for underground pressure surveys are: (I) the altimeter; (2) the inclined manometer with hose extensions. The altimeter is sufficiently accurate for determining the underground pressure gradient and is preferable to the nianometer for such work because of greater flexibility and shorter time required for the traverse. With the altimeter it is possible to select more widely separated observation stations than is practical with the manometer, with its restricted hose extension lengths. The altimeter also permits easier travel along haulage roads between airway observation stations, avoiding badly obstructed airways. The inclined manometer is more reliable than the altimeter for establishing friction coefficients in mine airways. Manometer readings are unaffected by differences in elevations between stations, which require corrections to altimeter data. The manometer provides direct reading without temperature correction, which may or may not be true with the altimeter, depending upon the make of instrument used. The elimination of correction factors combined with the instantaneous, simultaneous and

Jan 1, 1947

By Raymond Mancha

The purpose of an accurate underground pressure survey is to obtain a pressure gradient along the circuit or circuits under investigation. The pressure gradient shows the rate of pressure drop between various observation points along a circuit. This determines excessive resistance regions and the economic feasibility of correcting such conditions by cleaning airways, driving additional airways, or modifying existing airways. A pressure gradient is useful for predicting the effect on other parts of the circuit when adjusting the air regulation on any one split or when planning a field airshaft or slope or a new drift to the outcrop. A single-compartment airshaft often produces disappointing results because it relievcs only a part of the circuit instead of the over-all mine pressure. It is valuable to know how the circuit pressure drop is distributed. The underground pressure survey is used also to determine the friction coefficient for various types of airway. High precision work is required to establish these vital data for predicting the characteristics of mine pressure volume when projecting new mine developments. Methods Regardless of the type of instrument used to conduct a circuit pressure survey, the work should preferably be performed at a time when the mine is idle, in order to avoid air-flow disturbances from moving trips and cages or from the opening or closing of trap doors. Preferably the survey should be made when the barometer is comparatively steady, to restrict variation in the air specific weight at observation stations while the circuit is traversed. The two most commonly used instruments for underground pressure surveys are: (I) the altimeter; (2) the inclined manometer with hose extensions. The altimeter is sufficiently accurate for determining the underground pressure gradient and is preferable to the nianometer for such work because of greater flexibility and shorter time required for the traverse. With the altimeter it is possible to select more widely separated observation stations than is practical with the manometer, with its restricted hose extension lengths. The altimeter also permits easier travel along haulage roads between airway observation stations, avoiding badly obstructed airways. The inclined manometer is more reliable than the altimeter for establishing friction coefficients in mine airways. Manometer readings are unaffected by differences in elevations between stations, which require corrections to altimeter data. The manometer provides direct reading without temperature correction, which may or may not be true with the altimeter, depending upon the make of instrument used. The elimination of correction factors combined with the instantaneous, simultaneous and

Jan 1, 1947

By H. De. Cizancourt

There is no new outstanding fact to be noted concerning the development of petroleum production and research in France and her possessions during 1935. France.—Pechelbronn remains the only important producing field in France. The total output has reached 538,921 bbl., showing a small decrease on last year's figures. Out of this, 302,737 bbl. was extracted by drilling and 236,184 bbl. (44 per cent) was obtained by means of shafts and galleries. Exploration of deeper formations was still in progress, and resulted in the discovery of a new Middle Triassic (Muschel-Kalk) producing horizon. In the vicinity of Hirtzbach (South Alsace) shallow exploration tests (500 ft.) were drilled by the Société de Pechelbronn, oil indications being found in the Tertiary. Two more important wells are now drilling in deeper horizons. The Chantenay well (Niévre) was finished in August, 1935, at a depth of 3544 ft.1 A test is under progress in Savoie. South of Gabian, at Pezenas, the erection of a rig is nearly completed.

Jan 1, 1936

There is no new outstanding fact to be noted concerning the development of petroleum production and research in France and her possessions during 1935. France.—Pechelbronn remains the only important producing field in France. The total output has reached 538,921 bbl., showing a small decrease on last year's figures. Out of this, 302,737 bbl. was extracted by drilling and 236,184 bbl. (44 per cent) was obtained by means of shafts and galleries. Exploration of deeper formations was still in progress, and resulted in the discovery of a new Middle Triassic (Muschel-Kalk) producing horizon. In the vicinity of Hirtzbach (South Alsace) shallow exploration tests (500 ft.) were drilled by the Société de Pechelbronn, oil indications being found in the Tertiary. Two more important wells are now drilling in deeper horizons. The Chantenay well (Niévre) was finished in August, 1935, at a depth of 3544 ft.1 A test is under progress in Savoie. South of Gabian, at Pezenas, the erection of a rig is nearly completed.

Jan 1, 1936

Both drilling and production of oil decreased in Rumania during 1935. The drilling totaled 1,042,041 ft. and production 61,973,938 bhl., being a decrease of 8.5 and 1.6 per cent, respectively. Wells completed during the year totaled 198, of which 168 were oil wells, compared with 238 and 215, respectively, of 1934. No important discovery was made during the year. The only new field found was Valea Calugareasca, where the Credit Minier completed a small well on the westward plunge of the anticline. Drilling higher on the structure will probably prove the field to be of greater importance than the results of the discovery well indicate. The only other developments of importance were the extension of the Bucsani field, the opening up of a new area on the northeast of the salt at Moreni by Credit Minier and a minor extension of the West Gura Ocnitei field. At Calinesti, on the cast extension of the Moreni field, exploration work continued and a gas well was completed, but oil in commercial quantities is yet to be found.

Jan 1, 1936

Both drilling and production of oil decreased in Rumania during 1935. The drilling totaled 1,042,041 ft. and production 61,973,938 bhl., being a decrease of 8.5 and 1.6 per cent, respectively. Wells completed during the year totaled 198, of which 168 were oil wells, compared with 238 and 215, respectively, of 1934. No important discovery was made during the year. The only new field found was Valea Calugareasca, where the Credit Minier completed a small well on the westward plunge of the anticline. Drilling higher on the structure will probably prove the field to be of greater importance than the results of the discovery well indicate. The only other developments of importance were the extension of the Bucsani field, the opening up of a new area on the northeast of the salt at Moreni by Credit Minier and a minor extension of the West Gura Ocnitei field. At Calinesti, on the cast extension of the Moreni field, exploration work continued and a gas well was completed, but oil in commercial quantities is yet to be found.

Jan 1, 1936

By Mark S. Childs

FRIEDENSVILLE orebody in Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, lies in the south central part of the USGS Allentown Quadrangle. Physiographically the area is located in a small reentrant-known as Saucon Valley-of the Great Valley Province into the Reading Prong of the New England uplift. Saucon Valley itself is an oval-shaped lowland eight miles long and four miles wide, surrounded by ridges except where connected with the Great Valley through a breach in the rim known as Saucon Gap. These ridges, composed of Pre-Cambrian metamorphic rocks and Cambrian quartzites, rise some 500 ft above the valley floor. They are continuous with the New Jersey Highlands. The valley lowland is immediately underlain by lower Paleozoic dolomites and limestones. This area is one of low relief having a swing of approximately 100 ft, with an average elevation of 375 ft above sea level. The entire valley, which has a water shed of about 58 sq miles, is drained by Saucon Creek. This unit flows in a northeasterly direction to the Saucon Gap, where it discharges into the Lehigh River.

Jan 1, 1957

NEW MEMBERS The following list comprises the names of those persons who became members during the period of May 10, 1918, to June 10, 1918. ABEEL, GEORGE H., JR., Cons. Min. Engr., .4111 Lafayette Ave., St. Louis, Mo. ALLEN, CARL A Metal Min. Engr., U. S. Bureau of Mines, Butte, Mont. BECKER P. FRANK Engr., Lightner Min. Co., 35 Nassau St., New York, N. Y. BOCK, JAMES H., Steam Shovel Foreman, Chino Copper Co., Santa Rita, N. M. CARRON, FRANK X., Civ. and Min. Engr Rock Springs, Wyo. CROWE, THOMAS B., Mill Supt., Portland Mill, Portland Gold Min. Co., Victor, Colo. DOBSON, PERCY GRENSIDE, Min. Engr. and Geol., Crow's Nest Pass Coal Co., Fernie B. C., Canada. ESTABROOK, W. H., Capt., 3d Bat. 20th Engineers, A. E. F., Care postmaster, N.Y. FRASER, 0. B. J., Engr., International Nickel Co. of Canada, Ltd., Port Colborne, Ont., Canada. GARRIDO,. MANUEL F., Min. Engr 109 W. Myrtle St., San Antonio, Tex. GRODSKY, VLADIMIR ALEXANDROVITCH, Cons. Engr., Motor Products Corpn., Detroit, Mich.

Jan 7, 1918

NEW MEMBERS The following list comprises the names of those persons who became members during the period Dec. 10, 1916 to Dec. 31, 1916. BOWMAN, Joseph V., Chem., Andes Copper Mining Co., Chanaral, Chile, South America. CALDER, NORMAN L., Min. Geol., Cia. Minera y de Fomento, Watkins, Fomento Prov. de Santa Clara., Cuba. CONRADS, RALPH A., Met. Engr., Magna Plant, Utah Copper Co., Garfield, Utah. FARR, T. H. POWERS, JR. Asst. Assayer, Argonaut Mining Coy Jackson, Cal HAURY, PETER S., Min. Engr ...Alta Loma, Cal. HOULE, ARTHUR, Supt., Shattuck-Arizona Copper Co., Box 2009, Bisbee, Ariz. LEIB, VICTOR E?, Min. Engr 4204 Ave. D, Austin, Tex. LINDSLEY, THAYER, Min. Engr 82 Beaver St.,. New York, N. Y. POTTER, OCHA Supt., Superior Copper Co., Houghton, Mich. ROCCA, BERNARD T.; Engr., Bluebell Mine, Cons. Arizona Smelting Co., Mayer, Ariz. SAFFOLD, RAY P P.'0. Box 436, Douglas, Ariz. THOMS, JAMES EZRA, Asst. Chief, Milling, -Roasting, Acid Depts., Mineral Point Zinc. Co., Depue, Ill. TOMITA, HARUYOSHI, Met. Engr., Mitsubishi Co., Osaruzawa Mine, Akita-ken, Japan.

Jan 2, 1917

NEW MEMBERS The following list comprises the names of those persons who became members during the period of Aug. 10, 1917, to Sept. 10, 1917. ADKERSON, J. CARSON, Mgr., Stockwood Realty Corporation, Inc. Woodstock, Va. ARAKAWA, EIJI, Min. & Met. Engr., Min & Met. Dept., Imperial Univ., Kyoto, Japan. BAINS, THOMAS MELLOR, JR Major, Officers' Reserve Corps, Presidio, Cal. BARTON, Louis ARTHUR.. , . Vice-Pres., Adbar Development Co., Dewed, Minn. BLACKSTONE, ALEXANDER J....Asst. Engr., Honiestake Min. Co., Lead, SO: Dak. BOGARDUS, CHARLES EUGENE, Assayer & Chem., Bogardus Testing Laboratories 90 Columbia St., Seattle; Wash. BOISE, DAVID WELLS Chief Clerk, Chino Copper CO., Burley, New Mex. BREEDING, FRANK OWEN Assayer, Eden Min. CO., Bluefields, Nicaragua. BRUYERE, ALAN, Petroleum Geol., Producers' Oil CO., Box 96, Shreveport, La. BUTTS, ALLISON, Asst. Editor, The Mineral Industry, Lehigh Univ., So. Bethlehem, Pa. CALVERT, CLARENCE E Safety Engr., Anaconda Copper Min. CO., Butte, Mont. CHARLTON, HARRY.... Min. Engr, Commonwealth Edison CO., Taylorville, 111. CLAGUE, HERBERT NADEN, Surveyor.. Duncan, V. l., British Columbia, Canada. CLOSE, FREDERIC BAGLEY The Rampart, Los Angeles, Cal. COLLIER, DAVID HENDERSON, Mine Supt., Thumb, Butte Mines Co., Kingman, Ariz.

Jan 10, 1917

NEW MEMBERS The following list comprises the names of those persons who became members during the period Jan. 10, 1919, to Feb. 10, 1919. ADAMS, FRANCIS SPEARMAN, Supt., Power Dept., Anaconda Copper Min. Co.; Anaconda Mont. ALDERSON, G. E., Min. & Met. Engr 1317 Sloane Ave., Lakewood, Ohio. BENJOVSKY, T. D., Min. Engr., Cons. & Constr 2045 Vine St., Denver, Colo. BROPHY, OSCAR, Met 1523 S. Broad St., Philadelphia, Pa. BUTTRAM, FRANK, Chief Geol., Fortuna Oil Co., 424 Liberty National Bank Bldg., Oklahoma City, Okla. COCHRAN, R. B., Mine Supt., The Teziutlan Copper Co., Aire Libre Puebla., Mexico. CONNAR, T. C., Civ. & Min. Engr. & Geol.; Chief Engr., Zanesville Coal Co., Zanesville, Ohio. DAVE, E. O Capt., Co. A, 212th Engineers, Camp Devens, Mass. FOLEY, CHARLES B., Electro-Met., Martin Rockwell Corpn., 347 Madison Ave., New York,. N. Y. HOSFORD, WILLIAM F., Asst. Tech. Supt., Western Electric Co., Inc., Hawthorne Station, Chicago, Ill. HOSTER, M. T., Supt., French Creek Mines, E. & G. Brooke Iron Co., St. Peters, Pa. KAWASAKI, SHIGETARO, Chief Geol., Geological Survey of Chosen, Government General of Chosen, Keijo. Korea.

Jan 3, 1919

NEW MEMBERS The following list comprises the names of those persons who became members during the period Nov. 9, 1918, to Dec. 10, 1918. ALBERT, EDWARD J 235 E. Upsal St., Philadelphia, Pa. BARRY, D. A Supt. of. Mines, The Big Five Min. Co., Idaho Springs, Colo. BATON, GEORGE S., Cons. Min. Engr., Baton & Elliott, 2412 First National Bank Bldg., Pittsburgh, Pa. BAXTER, HAROLD ALEXANDER, Met. Engr. & Operation Supt., Tacony Ordnance Corpn., Philadelphia, Pa. BENNETT, JOHN S., Chem. and Min. Engr Copiap6, Chile, South America. BOWDEN, MALCOLM, Min. Engr.; Efficiency Engr., Elm Orlu Min. Co., Butte, Mont. BROWN, HAROLD C 2d Lieut., A. S. A. P. BROWN, THOMAS ALBERT, Min. and Met. Engr.; Supt., The Royal Tiger Mines Co., Breckenridge, Summit Co., Colo. BROWN, WALTER S., Investigator, New Jersey Zinc Co. (of Pa.), Palmerton, Pa. BURDETTE, R.. S Capt., Ord. Dept., U. S. A. CALLANDER, IRA C., Asst. Supt., Gauley Mountain Coal Co., Jodie P. 0., Fayette Co., W. Va. COLLINS, J. W., Foundryman, The Aluminum Casting's Co., "L" Plant, Cleveland, Ohio,

Jan 1, 1919

By S. Whinery

I am indebted to L. E. Bryant, of Danville, Ky., President of the Virginia Mining Co., operating coal-mines in Scott county, Tenn., for the following information relating to the existence of the Clinton iron-ore under the NW. slope of the Cumberland Plateau in Kentucky and Tennessee. During the past 15 years quite an important oil-field has been developed in a region having Wayne county, Ky., as its center, and a large number of wells have been drilled in that and adjacent territory in the search for oil. Many of these wells have been carried to considerable depths below the recognized oil-bearing horizon, and one of them was drilled by Mr. Bryant at Pine Knot, a station on the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific railroad, a few miles north of the point where that road crosses the Kentucky-Tennessee State-line. The elevation of

Jan 1, 1913

G. H. CLEVENGER, Colorado Springs, Colo.-Mr. Crowe's paper will be of great interest to cyanide operators, as it is a distinct new development in cyanidation. After reading the paper it occurred to me that some of us had done practically the same thing some time ago, but without design and unconsciously. I refer particularly to the operation of some of the earlier types of vacuum filter, used in connection with a dry vacuum pump and a receiver, which is somewhat similar equipment to that employed by Mr. Crowe. However, we did not appreciate the good effects we were getting from such of this solution as was precipitated, and it has remained for Mr. Crowe to bring distinctly to our attention the advantages of removing air from cyanide solutions before precipitation. Full credit is therefore due him for this very clever improvement in the cyanide process.

Jan 11, 1918

By John C. Smock

George Hammell Cook was born at Hanover, Morris County, New Jersey, January 5, 1818. His early education was obtained in the country school, and he was, for a short time, a teacher in his native town. In 1836 he was engaged, as a civil engineer, in making surveys and locating the line of the Morris and Essex Railroad from Newark to Morristown, and the extension of the road to the Delaware River. Appreciating the advantages of a thorough education, and seeking a wider field of usefulness, he entered the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute at Troy in 1838, and, was graduated from that .school in 1839. In this institution he heard the lectares of Amos Eaton, the famous teacher, from whom so many of our older scientists caught their inspiration and love for the natural sciences. After graduation, he was employed as a tutor in the school, and subse-

Jan 1, 1890

By H. L. Washburn, W. A. McConnell

There is not a coal preparation engineer alive who would equip his newest and most modern preparation plant with all new and untried pieces of equipment. He may install a few such pieces in which he has great confidence, but he will also spend much time assuring himself that everything else in the plant has been subjected to the test of time. He may arrange these units in a unique manner, but in general, they must have proven themselves elsewhere before he will approve them for his plant. A modern coal preparation plant contains only a few items of processing equipment, the remaining items being devices for materials handling. Consequently, pure automation is almost impossible. Although the main aim of automation is conservation of manpower, it generally results in uniformity of product, lower maintenance costs, and the many intangibles that make a better plant.

Jan 8, 1961

By Charles Sanford, William B. Schmidt, Eugene Moroni, John Murphy, Richard Bullock

An industry/government team sponsored by the Dept. of the Interior completed a study tour of the underground coal mining industries in Great Britain and Germany to review new and emerging coal mining technology. The group found that differences in tradition, mining conditions, and industry capabilities have led to different approaches in technological developments, many of which have the potential for application in U. S. mining. Both countries are working to improve materials and procedures for roadside pack wall. The British are developing a pump-packing system in which bentonite, water, stone, and a special cement are pipelined to the pack area to form a low strength compressible pack wall. The German industry is using anhydrite or blotzdammer to form a high strength pack wall. Both countries are using full-face tunnel-boring machines. The German industry has had considerable success with shield-type longwall supports.

Jan 1, 1977

By A. A. Dor

Of the numerous methods that have been tested or considered for the beneficiation of low-grade iron ores, this article deals only with proven flowsheets that are adopted in plants in operation or which have been reliably pilot-plant tested. Several recommended layouts are described and discussed. They illustrate recent trends and embody improvements and new features that have resulted from the experience acquired in the operation of the plants already in service. They have been developed, in the last few years, in the course of designing several iron ore beneficiation plants of various types and sizes. Some of the design features in the layouts which are submitted represent, in some respects, personal views and may not meet the full approval of others in this field. It is hoped that this presentation will provide an opportunity for constructive discussion of the problems involved and of suitable solutions.

Jan 6, 1962