Search Documents

By Lon Santis, Bill Evans, John Tatom

Debris data from the Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board’s Project ESKIMORE full-scale explosives event test program are compared to quantity-distance (Q/D) standards and quantitative risk analysis (QRA) methods. The ESKIMORE test program involved quantities of explosives ranging from 1,000 to 60,000 pounds detonated in typically sized structures made of metal and concrete. Debris from these events was extensively surveyed and catalogued. The debris patterns from these events show varying degrees of directionality normal to the walls of the structures. These density patterns are overlaid an existing explosives storage site that is comparable to the test conditions. Analysis of the debris patterns in relation to Q/D standards shows that exposures located beyond the Q/D arc but along the normal to walls of potential explosion sites (PES) may have much higher debris density than exposures at the same distance on the corners of the same PES. Analysis of the debris patterns shows that predicted patterns using the QRA tool IMESAFR v2.0 closely match actual patterns. Additionally, IMESAFR based QRA methods are able to quantify the different risk levels of being exposed along the wall’s normal as compared to being exposed on the structure’s corner. Methods and decision making criteria to mitigate risk based on the directionality of PES debris are presented. Copyright ©

Jan 1, 2015

By Detlef Sulzer, Winfried Rosenstock

"At the end of this century a great breakthrough in the field of blasting technology is finally going tobecome reality. That, in the true sense of the word, is the long expected and desired “HighTechnology Blasting”. So far trials have been carried out in Australia, Africa and Europe with remarkable results, that have been predicted by the authors. As a result, significant reductions of explosives and drilling expenditure are emerging for the future."

Jan 1, 1999

By Geoff Baldwin, Alastair C. Torrance

The use of monitors to assess equipment performance is carried out on a routine basis in many industries. The benefits gained through process control in knowing exactly how the equipment is working far outweigh the initial capital costs of the monitor. In the mining industry several dragline monitors have been developed and installed on equipment through out the world, but to date none has been fully accepted by the industry. This paper describes the use of a sophisticated monitoring system which incorporates an onboard processor to assess both dragline and blast performance. The use of a radio telemetry link for data transfer has removed the need for manual data collection and transfer, leading to a more efficient and powerful system. Significant effort has been put into the development and verification of a dig index to allow blast performance to be objectively assessed.

Jan 1, 1990

By Duane Skidmore, Calvin Konya

The supply crunch and cost rise for ammonium nitrate (AN) over the past year have been influenced by a number of factors. These include a general inflationary tendency, particularly great cost rises in fuel, and by a market condition in which demand for ammonium nitrate is great and supply is limited. Demand is largely confined to agricultural and explosives uses with explosives subdivided into mining, construction, and quarrying. The projections show that demand may be expected to increase markedly for the indefinite future in the agricultural and mining sectors of the ammonium nitrate market while fluctuating with indicators of economic activity for the construction and the quarrying sectors. Supply is projected to increase with plants being designed and built due to high need levels and commensurately high profit potential but not enough are planned to provide an equilibrium market. Constraints upon supply increases to match demand increases include shortages in the raw material, natural gas, high cost of investment capital, high equipment costs and long construction delays. The result should be, even under optimistic conditions, considerable shortage and resultant pressure for higher prices through 1979 for ammonium nitrate. The best hope for relief in the intervening years appears to be conservation. In blasting operations, the earliest and best proven route to conservation seems to be improved utilization available from application of highest available technology and most efficient current blasting practice.

Jan 1, 1975

By Benjamín Cebrián, David Flores, María Rocha Gil

This document shows the evolution of drilling and blast digitization process, savings and trends in a mine, using new technologies that creates business opportunities and general improvement of D&B process.

Feb 1, 2020

By Benjamin Cebrián, María Gil, David Flores

In many occasions during the Mining operation life, blasting engineers find different and controversial results of fragmentation, dilution or wall control for the same geotechnical domain and blast design (pattern and explosive charge). Most of the times, the difference between same blast designs is not measured, not controlled. Once a blast designed is defined, the most important part of the process after that is the implementation of every step of the blast on site. Almost nobody is measuring it, controlling it, but just controlling implementation is possible to relate blast design with results in a consistent way, to optimize the full process of D&B. Controlling implementation not only per event but also to check and change trends and decision-making is paramount for optimization and saving millions of extra costs every year. The lack of resources and the hardness to manage all the info created every day in a blast make this process very tough and difficult to maintain in long term. The use of new technologies on site and software that allows a best, more consistent and continuous control of blast implementation have been proved to be the key for optimizations and cost saving. This document shows the evolution of drilling and blast digitization process, savings and trends in a mine, using new technologies that creates business opportunities and general improvement of D&B process.

By Karl Ingmarsson

A model for drilling productivity and total drilling cost is presented. It specifically addresses down-thehole drilling, but also covers other drilling methods. The important factors are: 1, productivity in tons drilled; and 2, total cost per drill ton. For non-blasthole applications these factors are measured in drill feet and cost per foot. The model focuses on the entire system and allows the operator to optimize the system based on individual drilling conditions.

Jan 1, 1998

By Peter P. Harvey

The Nonel Primadet is a non-electric delay blasting cap initiation system. The most recent field application of the system in the Southwest has been at the Magma Superior Mine, Superior, Arizona.

Jan 1, 1978

By A N: Zditovetsky Shishov, M G. Menzhulin

At present in a building industry demand for products from granite, gabbro and other rocks, steady to erosion, natural and chemical weathering, was essentially increased. It has caused the enlargement of exploitation of stone block deposits and necessity of creation of new technologies of hard stone cut.

Jan 1, 1996

By J L. Jethwa, A G. Gaithankar

The paper deals with a software method developed to design the optimum blast parameters for tunnels and mine roadways for a given set of geo-mining condition without any major discontinuity. The application of the software is presently limited to 8 D-ahaped excavation where inclined hole cut or four-section parallel cut is used with smooth blasting technique.

Jan 1, 1993

By L D. Lawrence, W B. Sudweeks, J Bailey

Modern era urbanization is presenting at least one category of explosive consumers with a growing concern for ecological and environmental problems associated with their blasting processes. The construction industry is now, more than ever, being closely monitored with regard to its use of high explosives. In particular, contractors excavating the countless thousands of miles of various trench lines required for virtually every major new construction development taking place in America are being more closely scrutinized by local, state, and federal authorities with regard to blasting practices.

Jan 1, 1988

By Calvin Konya, Janos Foldesi

A bridge over a main line railroad system was scheduled for demolition. The bridge was made of reinforced concrete and spanned three mainline railroad tracks which could not be shut down due to blasting or demolition. To further complicate matters, the mainline tracks had high tension power lines running above the tracks, but below the bridge. These high tension wires provided the electricity for electrically powered trains. The tracks could not be damaged or disrupted, nor could the power line be broken.

Jan 1, 1992

By Richard J. Mainiero, Michael S. Wieland, Harry C. Verakis

The Bureau of Mines, U.S. Department of the Interior, has been conducting research on delay blasting in underground coal mines in support of the efforts of Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), U.S. Department of Labor, to revise coal mine blasting regulations. Part of the research centered on developing an understanding of the factors that lead to misfires of permissible explosives. Research was conducted to determine whether frequency of misfires was related to borehole spacing. For a wide variety of permissible explosives, misfires were observed for about 50 X of the holes at 45-cm (18-in) spacing. Misfires were also observed for 60-cm (24-in) spacing, but the frequency of misfires was much lower than observed for the 45-cm (18-in) spacing. The Bureau has recommended that hole spacings of less than 60 cm (24 in) be prohibited.

Jan 1, 1986

By B Mohanty, R Yang

Blasting vibration information is now commonly used to diagnose blast malfunctions. These range from limiting vibration levels to protect normal dwellings to determining scatter in detonator firing times, and even to rating of explosives in the borehole. Although blasting vibrations have the potential to yield reliable information in all these issues, there are key restrictions on their specific use, which are often ignored. These include all aspects of instrumentation, and sensor layout, as well as methods of analysis. This paper highlights these limitations. It emphasizes the distinction between near-field and far-field seismic recording in terms of borehole dimensions and blast geometry. Several case studies from both underground and open-pit blasting operations are discussed to illustrate and emphasize the essential characteristics of blasting vibrations and their optimal use in diagnosing blast malfunctions.

Jan 1, 1997

By Brent Blanchard

The use of explosives to safely fell structures can be traced back over 300 years. Since then, dozens of chemists, inventors, blasters and demolition experts worldwide have played prominent roles in the evolution of what has become the modern-day explosive demolition industry. In America, one of the earliest applications of explosive demolition occurred in response to the great fires of San Francisco, where homes and businesses were blasted with gunpowder in a desperate attempt to create firewalls. Later in the 19th century, inventions such as nitroglycerine, dynamite and blasting caps made structural blasting a safe, efficient alternative to conventional demolition methods. The 20th century brought the first experiments in shaped charge technology, and this, combined with developments in portable seismology and non-electric delay systems, allowed an ever-expanding variety of structures to be explosively felled by demolition experts throughout the country. The 1950s and .60s brought a new wave of commercial structural-blasting entrepreneurs (several of whom are still active today), and their efforts towards improving adjacent-structure protection and public relations beget the felling of large commercial buildings in dense urban environments. By the late 1980s, publicity-driven motives were gaining greater influence in the decision to .implode. various structures, and the transformation of blasting operations into promotional spectator events played a role in several injuries and fatalities. Since that time, however, a renewed sense of responsibility practiced by most blasting firms and project officials has resulted in the safe, successful completion of hundreds of recent endeavors. In sum, what appears today as an efficient, economical - and visually spectacular - way to demolish structures has its roots in developments of the past several centuries

Jan 1, 2002

By Doug Hoy

The scope of the Cliff Avenue Reconstruction Project in Sioux Falls, South Dakota was to widen a two lane highway to five lanes, along with removing and reconstructing both above and below ground utilities located along the project limits. The objective of this paper is to present the blasting techniques used in the rock excavation phase of the Cliff Avenue Reconstruction Project.

Jan 1, 1992

By Michael Beattie

A large open-cast limestone mine had its blasting operations severely restricted by the imposition of limiting PPV levels to protect a water pipe-line passing through the mine property. Attempts were made to measure the strains induced in the pipe by ground vibrations, so that a less restrictive blasting limitation could be established on a scientific basis.

Jan 1, 1992

By David E. Siskind

In the early 1980's, the Bureau of Mines published four reports of structural response and damage from surface mine blasting, vibration monitoring, and analysis methods. These findings replaced simpler and less restrictive Bureau criteria dating back to 1962 for ground vibration and 1943 for airblast.

Jan 1, 1991

By Jeffrey E. Loney, Andrew F. McKnown

Recovery of contaminated groundwater migrating through bedrock can be very difficult due to the low transmissivity of many bedrock fracture systems. To overcome these difficulties, a system of controlled "trench" blasting has been used on several projects to assist in cutting off and collecting groundwater plumes in bedrock. By using a combination of trench blasting and presplitting techniques, linear "fracture" zones are created in appropriate locations to significantly increase flow into recovery wells and control plume migration.

Jan 1, 1995

By Scott E. Winston, Spencer C. Watson

Dynamite is a generic term for a variety of high explosive formulations containing a blend of liquid and solid nitrate esters co-mixed with solid oxidizers and carbonaceous fuels. Dynamites can be divided into general classes of nongelatins, semi-gelatins, and gelatins which vary as to their detonation rates, densities, and water resistance. There are also numerous products within each classification depending on their utilization or on their permissibility in various types of underground mining operations.

Jan 1, 1985